Vivek Shetty – UCLA
Opening session for the institute. Establishes cohort identity through structured self-introductions (background, institution, capstone focus) to seed peer-learning and team formation. Explicit walkthrough of the five-phase structure, capstone deliverables, and scholar workflow from virtual sessions through in-person clinics to August deadline. Scholars leave with a concrete mental map connecting each subsequent session to their project development arc.
Eric Hekler – UC San Diego
Framework installation session. Introduces the “Implementable DTx” model as the shared conceptual scaffold for all content sessions and capstone projects. Frames how design decisions interact with behavior-change logic, context, equity, and evidence. Scholars receive a one-page framework reference to carry through the program — the evaluative lens for everything that follows.
Purpose: Team formation and problem selection
Process:
Outcome: Established team norms, selected health challenge, preliminary problem map
Continue asynchronous collaboration. Arrive at the in-person institute with a well-developed Capstone Proposal draft ready for iteration and expert critique.
Purpose: Problem refinement and solution conceptualization
Process:
Outcome: Clear problem statement, emerging solution framework, draft-ready foundation
Continue asynchronous collaboration. Arrive at the in-person institute with a well-developed Capstone Proposal draft ready for iteration and expert critique.
Luskin Center’s Plateia Restaurant
Craig Fox – UCLA
Every mHealth app, notification, and default setting is a choice environment—and most designers get it wrong. They treat users as passive targets of behavioral nudges, missing a critical insight: people actively interpret design choices, infer what those choices signal about expectations, and sometimes resist accordingly. In this opening lecture, Craig Fox introduces Choice Architecture 2.0, a framework that reconceptualizes mHealth design as an implicit conversation between intervention and user. Drawing on landmark trials that reshaped antibiotic prescribing, opioid safety, and vaccination uptake across hundreds of thousands of patients, Fox reveals when nudges work, when they backfire, and why anticipating user interpretation is the difference between interventions that stick and those that fail. Scholars will leave with a design lens they can apply to every session that follows—and carry directly into their capstone projects.
Connect with Scholars, Faculty, & Special Guests
Working lunch format allows scholars to receive targeted faculty feedback on capstone projects. Sign up for one track based on primary development need. Clinics run concurrent with lunch—bring your questions and your plate.
The promise of just-in-time adaptive interventions is simple: deliver the right support, at the right moment, in the right context. The science of fulfilling that promise is not. How do you know which intervention components work? When do they work best? For whom? And how do effects change over time? Predrag Klasnja— co-developer of the micro-randomized trial (MRT) methodology—has pioneered experimental designs that answer these questions with causal rigor. In this session, Klasnja draws on HeartSteps and other landmark studies to show how MRTs enable researchers to model time-varying treatment effects, identify contextual moderators, and iteratively optimize JITAI decision rules. Scholars will learn when to use MRTs versus traditional RCTs, how to specify proximal outcomes, and how to translate findings into adaptive algorithms that improve with use. This is the methodological bridge between JITAI theory (Nahum-Shani, Day 1) and real-world deployment.
Presentation development and practice
Team pitches (10 min) + Faculty feedback (5 min)
Two days of intensive learning. Hours of team collaboration. Now it all comes down to this. Each team steps into the spotlight to pitch their mHealth intervention—10 minutes on the clock, the full cohort watching, and a faculty panel ready to probe. Then 5 minutes of live feedback: direct, constructive, and designed to make your proposal stronger.
This isn’t a recitation. It’s a performance of ideas under pressure—clarity of thought, confidence in delivery, and the visible chemistry of a team that built something together. Faculty will score across eight dimensions, from problem framing to methodological rigor to real-world feasibility. But the deeper test is simpler: Can you convince a room full of experts that your intervention deserves to exist?
Expect tough questions. Expect recognition for what lands. And expect to walk away with the sharpest feedback you’ll receive before the September deadline. Bring your best work, your thickest skin, and your readiness to celebrate what this cohort has accomplished.
Certificate presentation and closing celebration
Stay up-to-date on the latest in mHealth!
mHealth Center for Discovery, Optimization &
Translation of Temporally-Precise Interventions
University of Memphis
Website sponsored by the mHealth Center for Discovery, Optimization & Translation of Temporally-Precise Interventions (mDOT).
mDOT is supported by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering through its Biomedical Technology Resource Centers Program.
Copyright © 2025 mHealth Training Institute. | All Rights Reserved